At one Venn Diagrams were held to be `New Maths’ and the
diagrams were embraced by teachers in Junior and Secondary schools. Times
change, new brooms and ideas come in, and old mathematical concepts are thrown
out. One of the problems with solving Venn diagrams is that there is an element
of problem solving – and all concerned have to think!
A set of objects can have the property of two. There can be
one fish in one pond and a second fish in the other pond. It only becomes
complicated when we add the third fish. Does Fish Three warrant another pool or
can that dear little fishy swim in number of pools? A Venn Diagram can help.
Here is an example:
A group of ten eleven plus students are preparing for the
examinations. Six are studying mathematics, five study verbal reasoning and seven
non-verbal reasoning. Three study maths and verbal reasoning while two work on verbal
reasoning and non-verbal reasoning. Four out of the ten study non-verbal reasoning
and mathematics.
Every eleven plus child is working on at least one of the subjects.
How many students are preparing for the eleven plus by working through all
three disciplines?
This type of question seems to be coming back into fashion. Some
eleven plus examinations now have numerical reasoning questions. Venn diagrams
can creep into this mixture. How do people solve a problem of this nature?
Some will build a table. The combinations will be recorded.
Others will perform some sort of algebra – along these
lines: (x – 1) + (3 – x) + x + (4 – x) + x + (2 – x) + (x + 1) = 10. As x + 9 =
10, so x = 1.
A few may even hold the combinations in their heads and come
up with the right answer in a remarkably short time. These are probably the mathematical
thinkers who realise that the three children studying maths and verbal
reasoning are included in all three subjects.
(So the answer is still 1!)
No comments:
Post a Comment